103208779 : Please kindly explain.

RedFlower : make tesla great again

Hoes for Harris : you are being played, rook. That is why you will always be broke

10baggerbamm : oh here we go we got a real mental Giant here people
so let's compare and video to Cisco because that's the classic example that people like to use and I'm sure that's what you're referring to..
so I'll just ask you these questions because you make a statement therefore you must be the expert
what was the multiple Cisco was trading at during the peak Apex just prior to the com's bursting?
so that you know I lived through that first hand I owned a broker dealer when this happened and I can tell you firsthand not because somebody's telling me or from something that I read or a tweet that somebody else said which is how you're garnishing your information.. during the.com era companies were priced 5 years into the future off a hypothetical estimate of what revenues would be what profits would be what market share would be at the present day so they were trading 5 years future evaluations in current market with no revenue with no earnings.
the closest companies today that fit a bubble or the SMR reactor stocks because most of them are pre-revenue it will be several years best case scenario before any product meaning a small modular reactor is installed operational.
that's the first group that are trading at insane valuations of course some people might argue that the data center build out in the news that President Trump said today which you probably didn't listen to him speak talk about how he's fast tracking approval and the companies that are building the data centers will have on site power generation capabilities right now gas is the easiest so that's your GE or no but I guess that's a bubble stock too right? but ultimately it will be nuclear stocks and you could have listened to Chris Wright speak about that yesterday but you probably didn't do that either.
the second group that I would say are similar to the com stocks  are the quantum stocks.
these for the most part are pre-revenue trading at insane market cap valuations and if you believe Jensen there are 20 to 30 years away Microsoft says much closer but let's suppose they're 5 years away even still they're trading it insane valuations and market caps present day.
Nvidia is making more money than every.com stock back then combined if you were to compare how much money Cisco was making at its peak it doesn't compare to what Nvidia is making today of course your goal is to get back to me what the valuation Cisco is trading at prior to the combursting and once you actually do a little homework rather than being a good little parrot and repeating what somebody else says you'll understand that the companies that are directly responsible for the data center build out which would be Nvidia they're not bubble stocks.
so go be like a little b and go fly away and you get back to me on the valuation that Cisco is trading at and if you don't which I don't suspect you will it validates my point that you really know nothing

来这里看人炫富 OP Hoes for Harris : The stock price is based on real money. The most pitiful are people like you who can't even understand the trend.

Hoes for Harris 来这里看人炫富 OP : lets compare portfolios and see who is making more money, rook. You are embarrassing yourself

Sam Vandersey : Mr. Gee. advanced money destroyer still eludes me. I play it by fall and rise. Still cannot make even 100$ profit. I am positive about this for the long term though.

WeiTheSaint469 : amd is just fine what issues on your laptop and laptop model?

Sam Vandersey : Mr Ripper. 110 puts is what I will get

RIPPER OP Sam Vandersey : I’m guessing it could open up a lot lower if this trend doesn’t reverse

努力赚钱让娃开心躺平 RIPPER OP : What kind of breakthrough is considered a reversal?