10baggerbamm : so in your opinion bitcoins over with there's going to be no more adoption worldwide Trump's not going to make a strategic reserve you're not going to see other countries sovereign Nations established strategic reserves after Trump you're not going to see continuous weekly flows into ETS because people get paid every week and they're on auto deposit help me out here why don't you just elaborate a little bit more if you can

10baggerbamm : I trade this one and I own this one versus the other one. they're all moving these leverage ETFs this one and the other one within a fraction of a percent of one another depending upon if it's trading at a discount in that asset value at a premium than that asset value. the reality is everyone's looking for a new all-time high on aetherium 4700 4800 whatever the number is and this ETF will be you know $15 and if it aetherium goes to $6k-8  which are the new Target prices you're talking twenties to 30s for this ETF

CosZero : A leveraged ETF is not ideal during periods of price swings. When the price fluctuates within a range, the ETF's value tends to decrease over time, even if the underlying stock remains at the same price. This decline is due to the mathematical imbalance in percentage changes between large and small numbers.

Hehehe 6 OP CosZero : thank you 10baggerbamm and Coszero for the kind explanantion

JaronLau CosZero : 意思是不是当他下跌10%，他需要上升11%来达到原本的价位，类似这个道理？

CosZero JaronLau : Similar. Also, because leverage is based on percentages rather than the difference between up and down. If the stock price is stagnant, it will tend to decline.

淡定的惠特莫爾 OP : Thank you Let's work hard together!

Ginvest : Thank you so much for the home work. I copied

TWIMO (151403908) : I am trying to figure out your message in order to execute this trade. Hopefully there’s still time to grasp. 1)Buy this ETF. 2)Sell CC Strike price 10, breakeven 9.08. 3)Sell CC Strike price 12, breakeven 9.84.
Correct?

I Am 102927471 :