Tom 07 : Yeah in the next 20 years?

AI Theory Tom 07 : Well it’ll still be developing along the way.  It’s not like it’ll be stagnant for the next 20 years and then all of a sudden pop.

Angelo Dupont OP Tom 07 : Probably by this Friday :) Lord always rise in 3 days

Angelo Dupont OP : Jensen said that only if Quantum grows in this pace, it will be too expensive for him to acquire, likely his in house engineers cannot create something as fast as possible to compete with IONQ.

Tom 07 : I don’t know I rather to believe the guy who beat 7 consecutive earnings than thx company doesn’t even makes money yet lol

AI Theory Tom 07 : Yah but how long did it take him to get to the top?   20+ years.  Imagine getting in so early like how we are here today at 50% discounts.  
Took my Fubo profits and started a position on quantum stocks.  Long hold for me.  I’ll see you in 20 years (hopefully with the exponential growth in tech, we’ll getter there a lot sooner than expected).

Tom 07 AI Theory : Good luck to you. May the market be with you

KyleyW OP : back in the days, many people doubt apple mac computer wouldn't be successful and apple wasn't earning as well. we are investing the future. jensen is just worried quantum development breakthrough and might affect his ai progress. cutting off fund into quantum R&D to buy him more time

Sinisloth : $Virgin Galactic (SPCE.US)$ $Hyperscale Data (GPUS.US)$

102701962 : Thanks for the dip Jensen

TokenSleep 102701962 : Right, this is 100% the time to buy and hold.

StockPeep : Yeah we don’t need your opinion Jensen, but thinks for the dip. More shares I buy :)

BelleWeather : I sold my second naked calls ever on quantum tickers last week (the first time was only a single contract, and while I had very high conviction, it wasn’t to the point of feeling that “I know,” and so risky that, well, one contract was a fine start. I did have the highest level of conviction that quantum stocks would correct, hugely and soon. Still sold extra time for obvious reasons. The only “new” idea I had going into the New Year with any confidence. I’m happy it worked out, of course, because the opposite would have been very not good. I’m so sorry for others, however. It was odd, as I mentioned, commented, shared the trade and spoke of the correction in a Moo Moo Livestream. And there was only one single response that considered essentially what Huang said possible, and many others who disagreed, most vehemently, some angrily and a few in an ugly fashion. Also, I explained my reasoning (same as Sir Jensen’s, but also others,) and it seemed that those in disagreement had none. I should think that a few hours of reading on the technology and examination of valuations and other fundamentals would have prompted caution at the least? I feel bad that the trade worked, but also, wish I saw more reasoning behind strong conviction trades from others. Unless trading purely junk pennys with TA, these things do matter, I think.