IonQ Inc Stock Discussion

• Cui Nyonya Kueh :

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• chrislee1116 :

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Big Curt : this guys has done no research

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Strain : why do you say so....I mean I assume u have done the research...wd like to hear POV n not just opinion

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 72321440 OP Big Curt : You’re an investor in quantum companies. I have a lot of respect for IonQ’s academic achievements. Their technique is to use trapped ions, which is literally what it sounds like, to store quantum information, instead of the superconducting transmon circuits that are popular in industry. These ions are held at room temperature, which is a strong advantage over superconducting. However, they have to be put in extremely low-pressure vacuums and controlled with lasers to have almost zero energy. The general view of industry players is that ion traps are too sensitive to be useful. The company has talked about putting out a 100-qubit computer called Tempo by the end of this year. Unfortunately, IBM is already far ahead of this scale. Yhe movement and timing of government contracts may be misrepresenting IonQ’s position as a leader in the field. Right now, the publicly traded quantum computing stocks are the only pure-plays in this area accessible to investors. There is no reason to buy Google or IBM for their quantum efforts. Quantinuum and other exciting companies are private. So, the impression for retail investors is to buy these 3rd-tier stocks because they’re the only ones which can move substantially. Despite its marginally higher revenue, mostly from their Air Force contract, IonQ is still behind all of the serious quantum players: IBM, Google, Quantinuum (private) and PsiQuantum (private). The most advanced IonQ machine on AWS Braket is the Forte 1, a mere 36-qubit machine. As I write, the Forte 1, which is $7,000 per hour,  went on an unscheduled maintenance recently; my experiments with IBM’s machine lead me to believe that even their stable, less error-prone, 128-qubit machines are useless. IonQ is not even close to 128 qubits! So, the premium of IonQ over Rigetti seems very unwarranted, and it is probably an even better short.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• StockPeep : People who talk like this obviously have a short position. Just ignore them

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 72321440 OP StockPeep : I don’t have a position in any of these companies. I have better positions to play off. I’m just stating the facts. It’s free money, as it’s essentially a scam.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

View more comments...

• chrislee1116 : something what

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• AI Theory : I’ve seen some things.  Feeling really good

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Zz catalyst : no

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 72321440 : dont rely off people’s comments to invest in a company. do research.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 72321440 Zz catalyst :

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Ultratech : stop. no one knows this especially YOU.  keep your mouth shut and wait to see what happens.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Mercado : Hmm.. time to take some profits

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Liu XC OP Ultratech : You don’t agree, buy calls

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Ultratech Liu XC OP : hey. listen, just because you buy puts and try to post bearish sediment pushing fear if you manipulate ppl into selling it won't help position. stop trying to fk over moomoo users.  i want to make an example out of you and encourage anyone reading this to block this guy and anyone like him. this app is full of permabears that don't know anything just brainless short positions and nothing else they try to act like smarter but most of them have very small accounts just gambling options no long term investment growth . you're only speculating it'll go down for 2 weeks?  you want ppl to believe you hold a magic crystal ball that 2 weeks of downtrend and if your wrong ppl sell what happens you just fked over anyone who may be looking at recouping loss are you going to pay them back or just disappear   ?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 104132545 Shalom : You must be an option salesman. Get a proper job, work hard and use cash to buy stock instead of option. Learn from Warren Buffet who never buy options and never use borrowed money to buy stocks.  Then you don’t need to scream your strange predictions to draw attention.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

View more comments...

• 151158967 : Thank you, @Jaguar8 . Your hard work is appreciated!

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 103687630 : I think, what do you think of ONDS? There was good news on Wednesday but it went down. Do you think there is a chance for a rebound?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Jaguar8 OP 103687630 : I didn’t choose it because it didn’t specify how much is the contract.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 103687630 Jaguar8 OP : Okay, thank you for your reply

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 70761249 : Can VERI make a breakthrough in the short term? The recent wildfires in Southern California are really heartbreaking, causing significant disappointment in the credibility of the media and government.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

View more comments...

• 104128755 : he’s not, almost all of them are being used in research… not exactly “commercialised” lol, and he has a QC team of his own, he’s a well educated engineer, why do you guys think he wouldn’t know better? he’s even funding some of the QC companies lol

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Ultratech : maybe he's right?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply