US OptionsDetailed Quotes
IONQ250110P48000
- 18.10
- +16.85+1348.00%
15min DelayClose Jan 8 16:00 ET
21.35High8.95Low
10.00Open1.25Pre Close434 Volume780 Open Interest48.00Strike Price615.65KTurnover0.00%IV1.16%PremiumJan 10, 2025Expiry Date17.75Intrinsic Value100Multiplier0DDays to Expiry0.35Extrinsic Value100Contract SizeAmericanOptions Type--Delta--Gamma1.71Leverage Ratio--Theta--Rho--Eff Leverage--Vega
IonQ Inc Stock Discussion
Sign in to post a comment
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ useless company. not just behind their time. utterley useless. Anyone saying otherwise has not done a hint of research
2
11
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ i like quantum technology and believe it a future tech but will need time to be commercially viable. Today, all the quantum stocks are running too far way ahead of theirs current values. Not the right time.
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ im hearing some things 😮
2
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ will it drop more before 20 Jan?
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ so guys buy now or no
3
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ Friday will be interesting for Quantum stocks 🤑🤑
2
$D-Wave Quantum (QBTS.US)$ $IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ $Rigetti Computing (RGTI.US)$ the quantum bear trend will continue for another 2weeks! the rebounce is for options and trapped large capitals
5
38
![[undefined]](https://static.moomoo.com/nnq/emoji/static/image/default/default-black.png?imageMogr2/thumbnail/36x36 "undefined"){kind=small}
NOTE!
1. NFA (Not Financial Advice!)
2. Do NOT open position WITHOUT chart confirmation, indicators, momentum.
3. Scale out and secure profits.
4. Most importantly, DON’T BLAME ME for your losses. Your trade, your accountability.
5. I DO NOT give buy or sell advice
6 COH (cash on hand); AH (after hours): RTH (regular trading hours); PR (press release; FCF (free cash flow)
7. NE...
1. NFA (Not Financial Advice!)
2. Do NOT open position WITHOUT chart confirmation, indicators, momentum.
3. Scale out and secure profits.
4. Most importantly, DON’T BLAME ME for your losses. Your trade, your accountability.
5. I DO NOT give buy or sell advice
6 COH (cash on hand); AH (after hours): RTH (regular trading hours); PR (press release; FCF (free cash flow)
7. NE...
85
21
9
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ opened a position at 30.00 hoping to catch a bounce. do you think we are expected to taking another dip before the actual bounce happens? or is 30 a good entry point?
1
2
No comment yet
Big Curt : this guys has done no research
Strain : why do you say so....I mean I assume u have done the research...wd like to hear POV n not just opinion
72321440 OP Big Curt :
You’re an investor in quantum companies. I have a lot of respect for IonQ’s academic achievements. Their technique is to use trapped ions, which is literally what it sounds like, to store quantum information, instead of the superconducting transmon circuits that are popular in industry. These ions are held at room temperature, which is a strong advantage over superconducting. However, they have to be put in extremely low-pressure vacuums and controlled with lasers to have almost zero energy. The general view of industry players is that ion traps are too sensitive to be useful. The company has talked about putting out a 100-qubit computer called Tempo by the end of this year. Unfortunately, IBM is already far ahead of this scale. Yhe movement and timing of government contracts may be misrepresenting IonQ’s position as a leader in the field. Right now, the publicly traded quantum computing stocks are the only pure-plays in this area accessible to investors. There is no reason to buy Google or IBM for their quantum efforts. Quantinuum and other exciting companies are private. So, the impression for retail investors is to buy these 3rd-tier stocks because they’re the only ones which can move substantially. Despite its marginally higher revenue, mostly from their Air Force contract, IonQ is still behind all of the serious quantum players: IBM, Google, Quantinuum (private) and PsiQuantum (private). The most advanced IonQ machine on AWS Braket is the Forte 1, a mere 36-qubit machine. As I write, the Forte 1, which is $7,000 per hour, went on an unscheduled maintenance recently; my experiments with IBM’s machine lead me to believe that even their stable, less error-prone, 128-qubit machines are useless. IonQ is not even close to 128 qubits! So, the premium of IonQ over Rigetti seems very unwarranted, and it is probably an even better short.
StockPeep : People who talk like this obviously have a short position. Just ignore them
72321440 OP StockPeep : I don’t have a position in any of these companies. I have better positions to play off. I’m just stating the facts. It’s free money, as it’s essentially a scam.
View more comments...