• Suavesuave : is 950 strong support?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Gini OP Suavesuave : supposed to. .but its going down and up inconsistently. .so i have to take my profit before it drop

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Silverbat : 945?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• GUSTAV : why would it be affected

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• mmarrssss OP GUSTAV : i just say so. coz all us market seem to be all red

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Buy n Die Together❤ :

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• ZnWC : Thanks for the event Here is my input:
  Like the internet and smart phones, AI will be part of everyday life. I have already invested in AI related stocks for the longer-term and I believe Stargate will be realized which is only a matter of time.
  When we see AI achieved AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), the related stocks will grow rapidly. I foresee AGI will come in autonomous vehicles and robotics in the near future. The other sector which will change the world is quantum computing (QC).
  Unfortunately investing in AGI or QC requires a big risk appetite which most retail investors don't have. We tend to lose conviction when we see the stock not gaining value.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Aaron Invests (AI) :

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Dan’l : Thanks…
  Any week that includes the all-time intraday and closing records went “better than expected” (even if not as I’d anticipated  ~;-)

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 晴瓦林 : AI is another way to say generalized statistics. It can't create new things, but only to recycle the old information. I bet half of the investors don't even know how their company's product was created. I won't be moved by stuff that is in the experimental stage.
  But AI companies managed to create chatbots that can transfer knowledge to human students faster than a teacher could by recycling old information algorithmically. It's just having a problem with most niche fields.
  I was working on an algorithm that may need lyndon factorization to complete. But the chatbot always gives the wrong answer, or running into self-persuasion when trying to reason my questions. It's more biased than you can think of.
  So there are many things left to do to improve chatbots, but usually the organizational culture makes the product more costly to develop than it should.
  What they're doing with chatbot is that they're trying to solve problems that don't exist, or problems that are impossible to solve, then market it to everyone before they're finished. Yes, you have to pay to be their lab mice.
  They even have to figure out a reason for you to use their chatbot because improving the world is their second thought and not the first. How's that not a red flag?
  It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. Almost all companies are psychology companies, they make revenue based on how much they can persuade people into buying packaged material at a mark-up price without them noticing.
  They'll repeat their slogan over and over, and that's how they always seem right to people. I'd be surprised if Coca-Cola started to promote Pepsi, or Intel promoting AMD just because their competitor is beneficial for customers.
  The world doesn't really need changes, it'd mostly lead to more conflict of interest. We need less of that already.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Space Dust : Inconceivable. Always a new thing unexpected and sounding as if plucked from a fictional story.
  Surreal. And we know the party is just getting started.
  clowns to the left, jokers to the right..

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

View more comments...