The Federal Reserve's reins fluctuating between inflation and financial stability

Since the government shutdown was avoided, the movement to buy risk assets by selling safe assets has intensified. As a result, long-term interest rates have risen. Uncertainty factors overlap, such as the postponement of government shutdowns, the UAW strike, and the resumption of student loan payments. In this situation, opinions are divided even among Fed directors. Just yesterday, while Director Bowman of the hawk faction insisted on multiple interest rate hikes by the end of the year even if PCE settles down, Vice Chairman Barr (in charge of financial supervision) acknowledged that issues have already shifted to a period of maintaining high interest rates, and interest rate hikes are in the final phase. In the end, Chairman Powell will decide, and it seems that Chairman Powell will agree with Vice Chairman Barr.
The difference in judgment between Director Bowman and Vice Chairman Barr is how much emphasis is placed on financial stability in monetary policy purposes. Vice Chairman Barr said that financial stability has been the biggest concern since the birth of the Fed system in 1913, and he is afraid that raising interest rates too much will destabilize the financial system. In order to achieve the three policy goals of price stability, economic stability, and financial stability with a single policy instrument (interest rate), it is necessary for the Fed to make comprehensive judgments based on exquisite technology. What Vice Chairman Barr is worried about is that balance sheet contractions are beginning to have an impact on the market in earnest. Since stocks rose due to the expansion of balance sheets, balance sheet contraction means a decline in stocks. Vice Chairman Barr seems to recognize that continuing QT is substantially equal to raising interest rates in a world where further interest rate increases are not being carried out.