$SKY BLUE 11(01010.HK$
They are detained by the Financial Services Agency for being complicit in insider trading, and it seems that if you don't want everyone's screenshots and information presented to the Financial Services Agency, there is also a way to bear a fine. Even though it has just been damaged, they are trying to further squeeze it out. They are shrewd guys. Don't be fooled.
In the first place, fraudsters are the ones who spread false information about the company. Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, it seems to be “spreading rumours” or “false accusations.”
Please say that is where the question will be asked. I'm probably Chinese, so I don't think I understand it.
Please protect yourself. Don't be harmed any further.
They are detained by the Financial Services Agency for being complicit in insider trading, and it seems that if you don't want everyone's screenshots and information presented to the Financial Services Agency, there is also a way to bear a fine. Even though it has just been damaged, they are trying to further squeeze it out. They are shrewd guys. Don't be fooled.
In the first place, fraudsters are the ones who spread false information about the company. Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, it seems to be “spreading rumours” or “false accusations.”
Please say that is where the question will be asked. I'm probably Chinese, so I don't think I understand it.
Please protect yourself. Don't be harmed any further.
Translated
11
22
They are detained by the Financial Services Agency for being complicit in insider trading, and it seems that if you don't want everyone's screenshots and information presented to the Financial Services Agency, there is also a way to bear a fine. Even though it has just been damaged, they are trying to further squeeze it out. They are shrewd guys. Don't be fooled.
In the first place, fraudsters are the ones who spread false information about the company. Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, it seems to be “spreading rumours” or “false accusations.”
Please say that is where the question will be asked. I'm probably Chinese, so I don't think I understand it.
Please protect yourself. Don't be harmed any further.
In the first place, fraudsters are the ones who spread false information about the company. Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, it seems to be “spreading rumours” or “false accusations.”
Please say that is where the question will be asked. I'm probably Chinese, so I don't think I understand it.
Please protect yourself. Don't be harmed any further.
Translated
$SKY BLUE 11(01010.HK$
I feel that little by little, the contradictions and differences in the story are getting bigger.
Someone in the group today touched on the Dutch company takeover that was announced this morning. It was stated that a memorandum of understanding with no legal effect was signed, and that only superyachts and luxury yachts will be manufactured. Regarding the points that were not mentioned about Huawei semiconductors, I was wondering if it was okay.
In response to that, roughly speaking, the reply was that they didn't want the US to find out that it was still a subsidiary of Huawei.
I think it's impossible to spread the word by softly telling it only to people who buy stocks without getting caught in America.
It is said that institutional investors are buying a lot, but it's still 1, and after all, do they want to know or not be known?
Until recently, it would be amazing if this came to light. They said they could break through 10 Hong Kong dollars by 3 times 4 times, but wouldn't it be bad if they knew it now? Moreover, it is known in a modest way, and why are confidential matters known to me as such an ordinary person?
Looks like they'll be here soon, right?
Everyone, be careful!
I feel that little by little, the contradictions and differences in the story are getting bigger.
Someone in the group today touched on the Dutch company takeover that was announced this morning. It was stated that a memorandum of understanding with no legal effect was signed, and that only superyachts and luxury yachts will be manufactured. Regarding the points that were not mentioned about Huawei semiconductors, I was wondering if it was okay.
In response to that, roughly speaking, the reply was that they didn't want the US to find out that it was still a subsidiary of Huawei.
I think it's impossible to spread the word by softly telling it only to people who buy stocks without getting caught in America.
It is said that institutional investors are buying a lot, but it's still 1, and after all, do they want to know or not be known?
Until recently, it would be amazing if this came to light. They said they could break through 10 Hong Kong dollars by 3 times 4 times, but wouldn't it be bad if they knew it now? Moreover, it is known in a modest way, and why are confidential matters known to me as such an ordinary person?
Looks like they'll be here soon, right?
Everyone, be careful!
Translated
11
4
$SKY BLUE 11(01010.HK$
It is said that semiconductors are being transferred to Huawei. The Mate60Pro, which uses that semiconductor, is selling well, and it seems that they are waiting for 2 months.
They are in stock at ETOREN, and you can even buy them at Rakuten Ichiba.
I wonder if it's about time we close our hands.
It is said that semiconductors are being transferred to Huawei. The Mate60Pro, which uses that semiconductor, is selling well, and it seems that they are waiting for 2 months.
They are in stock at ETOREN, and you can even buy them at Rakuten Ichiba.
I wonder if it's about time we close our hands.
Translated
5
5
$SKY BLUE 11(01010.HK$
A large number of institutional investors have joined the group, and it is said that they have begun to buy in large quantities, but I think institutional investors are 1. It is said that there have been quite a few purchases, but it only looks like there are a lot of sales, but if you get this far, you won't know what is a lie and what is true. How is it actually?
A large number of institutional investors have joined the group, and it is said that they have begun to buy in large quantities, but I think institutional investors are 1. It is said that there have been quite a few purchases, but it only looks like there are a lot of sales, but if you get this far, you won't know what is a lie and what is true. How is it actually?
Translated
3
5
![[empty]](https://static.moomoo.com/node_futunn_nnq/assets/images/folder.5c37692712.png)
![[error]](https://static.moomoo.com/node_futunn_nnq/assets/images/no-network.991ae8055c.png)
![[loading]]()
ふくとしゆ OP : Right. I used that material as a reference elsewhere. thank you very much.
ふくとしゆ OP Ando12 : I don't think it's been done yet.
Every day they say that starting Monday this week, it will resume today, and it will resume today, but it won't resume.
For the time being, they are saying that today they will resume with several options, so they will sell at 0.3. I've also apologized for the fact that the information up until now was wrong. I've even said that it won't go up anymore.
I think scammers will buy back or reprepare short sales in 0.3.
ふくとしゆ OP どん底リベンジャー : We can assume that this time, fraudsters are involved in the company itself. That's why it's become so famous in so many ways, so I think it's a bit difficult to get away with saying it's irrelevant.
If that happens, I'm afraid of delisting even if it is resumed, so I would sell it right away and cash it out.
In any case, even if it's based on the number of ticks, I don't think it's possible to have a limit of 0.3, so I think it's better to sell at the lowest price possible. Even if it's the worst kind of situation.
It's possible, but I'm guessing it's a pattern where short sales are bought back immediately after the resumption, trading is interrupted again immediately, and delisted after a while.
ふくとしゆ OP ふくとしゆ OP : I don't think the fraudster went according to the scenario I had anticipated this time, but I think it's within expectations that can be fully predicted. There are still ways to make money even after this, and they are being implemented.
Prioritize as soon as possible, sell out at the highest possible price, and cut off engagement first. I think it would be better to move on to other transactions with the funds sold. I said it in a different post, but I think you can earn enough if you do it steadily with a small amount of money without chasing them too deep. I think I learned a lot from this experience. I began to be careful after experiencing a major crash in other stocks myself. I've been collecting data and gradually establishing crash patterns in my own way. Let's study and get back on our feet early!
ふくとしゆ OP どん底リベンジャー : I think it depends on the securities company.
For example, if you can only limit up to 10 ticks, I think there are many cases where it is only possible to go below 0.1 in the case of 01010. In that case, the order itself will be cancelled for a limit value of 1.13 or less.
I wonder if it will be decided at the same time as trading starts, or if it doesn't sell at 1.13, it will go down.
View more comments...