Why EV stocks will fail in the future
Global warming from CO2 is a lie because its impossible. Heres proof:
Water vapor isn’t a ‘global warming’ gas… it acts as a literal refrigerant (in the strict ‘refrigeration cycle’ sense) below the tropopause.
You know, the refrigeration cycle (Earth) [A/C system]:A liquid evaporates at the heat source(the surface) [in the evaporator], it is transported (convected) [via an A/C compressor], it emits radiation to the heat sink and undergoes phase change (emits radiation in the upper atmosphere, the majority of which is upwelling owing to the mean free path length / altitude / air density relation) [in the condenser], it is transported (falls as rain or snow) [via that A/C compressor], and the cycle repeats.
These climate global warming idiots have come to believe that energy actually can flow 'cooler to warmer' (the basis of their 'backradiation' blather). This violates 2LoT in the Clausius Statement sense... energy cannot flow from lower energy density to higher energy density without external energy doing work upon the system to push that energy against the energy gradient. Do remember that a warmer object will have higher energy density at all wavelengths than a cooler object.
CO2 isn’t a ‘global warming’ gas… it acts as a net atmospheric coolant at all altitudes except a negligible warming at the tropopause.
adding more of the predominant upper-atmospheric radiative coolant causes more emitters per unit volume, which causes more emission per unit volume, which causes more emission to space, which causes a larger loss of energy from the system known as ‘Earth’, which causes cooling. It is the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics which are the actual ‘greenhouse’ gases… remember that an actual greenhouse works by hindering convection.
Monoatomics (Ar) have no vibrational mode quantum states, and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR. Homonuclear diatomics (O2, N2) have no net magnetic dipole and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR unless that net-zero magnetic dipole is perturbed via collision. Once in the upper atmosphere, they could not as effectively radiatively emit that energy, the upper atmosphere would warm, lending less buoyancy to convecting air, thus hindering convection… and that’s how an actual greenhouse works, by hindering convection.
Free energy is defined as the capacity to do work. If U = TS, p_photon = u/3 = p_object, energy cannot flow because no work can be done. Helmholtz Free Energy is zero. Photon chemical potential is zero.So in the real world, the energy density gradient determines radiant exitance, energy does not flow willy-nilly without regard to energy density gradient and 2Lot applies always and everywhere.
You just got scienced!
Water vapor isn’t a ‘global warming’ gas… it acts as a literal refrigerant (in the strict ‘refrigeration cycle’ sense) below the tropopause.
You know, the refrigeration cycle (Earth) [A/C system]:A liquid evaporates at the heat source(the surface) [in the evaporator], it is transported (convected) [via an A/C compressor], it emits radiation to the heat sink and undergoes phase change (emits radiation in the upper atmosphere, the majority of which is upwelling owing to the mean free path length / altitude / air density relation) [in the condenser], it is transported (falls as rain or snow) [via that A/C compressor], and the cycle repeats.
These climate global warming idiots have come to believe that energy actually can flow 'cooler to warmer' (the basis of their 'backradiation' blather). This violates 2LoT in the Clausius Statement sense... energy cannot flow from lower energy density to higher energy density without external energy doing work upon the system to push that energy against the energy gradient. Do remember that a warmer object will have higher energy density at all wavelengths than a cooler object.
CO2 isn’t a ‘global warming’ gas… it acts as a net atmospheric coolant at all altitudes except a negligible warming at the tropopause.
adding more of the predominant upper-atmospheric radiative coolant causes more emitters per unit volume, which causes more emission per unit volume, which causes more emission to space, which causes a larger loss of energy from the system known as ‘Earth’, which causes cooling. It is the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics which are the actual ‘greenhouse’ gases… remember that an actual greenhouse works by hindering convection.
Monoatomics (Ar) have no vibrational mode quantum states, and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR. Homonuclear diatomics (O2, N2) have no net magnetic dipole and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR unless that net-zero magnetic dipole is perturbed via collision. Once in the upper atmosphere, they could not as effectively radiatively emit that energy, the upper atmosphere would warm, lending less buoyancy to convecting air, thus hindering convection… and that’s how an actual greenhouse works, by hindering convection.
Free energy is defined as the capacity to do work. If U = TS, p_photon = u/3 = p_object, energy cannot flow because no work can be done. Helmholtz Free Energy is zero. Photon chemical potential is zero.So in the real world, the energy density gradient determines radiant exitance, energy does not flow willy-nilly without regard to energy density gradient and 2Lot applies always and everywhere.
You just got scienced!
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
Machiavellis3rdEye : Man I wanted to hear you speak on amc this morning! I thought everyone knew how much of a sham global warming was sInce Al GoRe.
efficentupup : insight
Mcsnacks H Tupack OP Machiavellis3rdEye : Reuters and the Weather channel are promoting climate change. It’s Getting worse. I said AMC was about to break into the 40.00’s last week when it bounced off resistance At 31.88. Everyone that asked if it was time to buy i said just as long as they bought under 34.00 it was fine and once it cleared 37.12 it would run to 46.00 before it met a critical resistance point
Mcsnacks H Tupack OP Machiavellis3rdEye : It will keep moving up just as long as it doesn’t dip below 37.00 and makes it above 46.55.
Machiavellis3rdEye Mcsnacks H Tupack OP : Well I bought Down from 45 to sub 29 for over month... it was brutal.
But now I know what it feels like to make 50 racks in less than a day.
Machiavellis3rdEye Mcsnacks H Tupack OP : But why was the 24th any different than the last few possible catalyst events (i.e. Registering our shares online to hopefully force recount) .... because after the last three or four falls alarms, I really was genuinely surprised yesterday! Figured you might have The Explanation.
Mcsnacks H Tupack OP Machiavellis3rdEye : You just have to go by If the stock is making higher lows or lower lows day by day. That tells you if people are buying or selling. Don’t listen to phantom shares or naked shares. The only share count to watch are the FTDs because that’s what the SEC and FINRA have on record. That’s probably what happened yesterday. Most of the FTDs were probably settled. Should have been about 2-3million shares. But now that they are settled If They arent bought today that’s what will make it fall back under 40.00
Mcsnacks H Tupack OP Machiavellis3rdEye : See notice the Price when the shares get to their lowest point. It’s when the stock is at the lowest points. Because after they buy the FTDS the stock goes up.
Mcsnacks H Tupack OP Machiavellis3rdEye : And notice that after it goes up what happens? It goes down until the FTDs become too many again. So you can sell for max profit today or hoLd until FTDs become too High again. Unless it can clear 46.55.
Machiavellis3rdEye Mcsnacks H Tupack OP : Starting to see the picture more clearly now.
So I have to sell off the rest of my AApl and tsla to buy amc all day today.... again? Ok.
And what about It’s twin brother gme? Same need for volume today? Any Technical levels to watch for?
Higher Lows and higher highs...I see it now...kinda like building Our stairWay to Heaven. Thanks for the lessons.
View more comments...